Deep learning-assisted wavefront correction with sparse data for holographic tomography
Optics and Lasers in Engineering, ISSN: 0143-8166, Vol: 154, Page: 107010
2022
- 13Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, a novel approach using deep learning-assisted wavefront correction in beam rotation holographic tomography to acquire three-dimensional images of native biological cell samples is described. With digitally recorded holograms, the wavefront aberration is contained in the reconstructed phases. However, there are large computation costs for compensating the phase aberration during the reconstruction. With the aid of a deep convolution network, we present an effective algorithm on the reconstructed phases with sparse data for active wavefront correction. To accomplish this, we developed a Res-Unet scheme to segment the cell region from its background aberration and a deep regression network for the representation of the aberration on Zernike orthonormal basis. Moreover, a sparse data fitting algorithm was used to predict the Zernike coefficients of whole scanning angles from the collected sparse data. As a result, the proposed algorithm is capable of accurately correcting the background aberration and much faster than the original plain algorithm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816622000653; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125630242&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0143816622000653; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107010
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know