Analysis of diffraction gratings displayed in spatial light modulators at the Nyquist limit: Application to the triplicator grating
Optics and Lasers in Engineering, ISSN: 0143-8166, Vol: 184, Page: 108628
2025
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this work we analyze diffraction gratings displayed on a pixelated spatial light modulator (SLM) at its spatial resolution limit (Nyquist limit) i.e., with largest diffraction angle, where the binary phase profile is the only alternative. Their implementation is influenced by the effect of a sinc envelope and the multiple replicas of the diffraction pattern that arise from the SLM pixelation, where the fill factor plays an essential role. We use the Fourier transform theory to analyze the binary phase grating in a pixelated device in terms of the pixel size, fill factor and phase difference between the two levels in the grating. This convolutional approach probes very useful to gain physical insight of the different contributions to the diffraction orders, and analytical expressions for the complex amplitude coefficients and intensities are obtained. Experimental verification is provided by encoding binary phase triplicator gratings with different periods on a high-resolution liquid-crystal on silicon SLM. The effect of the device pixelation and pixel crosstalk on the diffraction efficiency and on the conditions to obtain a Nyquist triplicator phase grating are studied. These results can be interesting for applications requiring programmable and large beam steering angles.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know