LC-SLM spherical phase model holographic display flexibility improved
Optics and Lasers in Engineering, ISSN: 0143-8166, Vol: 186, Page: 108771
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The use of a liquid crystal spatial light modulator (LC-SLM) for holographic image display inevitably leads to interference from zero-order spots and multi-level diffraction images. This paper explores the methods for determining the effective reproduction distance and optimal target image size range in the context of LC-SLM holographic reproduction. We introduce a spherical phase model that addresses the impact of the inherent limitations and inaccurate in initial parameter settings of LC-SLM on the holographic reproduction results. The aim is to enhance the flexibility of LC-SLM holographic imaging displays. The efficacy of our method was validated through optical experimentation utilizing a semiconductor laser as the light source, resulting in the generation of high-quality 2D and 3D dynamic holographic displays. The experimental results demonstrate that optimizing the reproduction distance range and target image size can mitigate the effects of LC-SLM zero-order spots and multi-level diffraction images. Furthermore, the incorporation of the spherical phase model effectively addresses the challenges associated with capturing display results, including those caused by inherent LC-SLM defects, initial parameter settings, and flexibility. This integration also facilitates the deployment of LC-SLM in holographic imaging displays and other applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816624007516; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108771; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85211722705&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0143816624007516; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108771
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know