Parasocial diffusion: K-pop fandoms help drive COVID-19 public health messaging on social media
Online Social Networks and Media, ISSN: 2468-6964, Vol: 37, Page: 100267
2023
- 1Citations
- 62Captures
- 17Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust
Many thought leaders and organizations in this space have appeared to suggest that interpersonal communication is the (only) way to reduce political divides, rather than
Review Description
We examine an unexpected but significant source of positive public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic—K-pop fandoms. Leveraging more than 7 million tweets related to mask-wearing and K-pop between March 2020 and December 2021, we analyzed the online spread of the hashtag #WearAMask and vaccine-related tweets amid anti-mask sentiments and public health misinformation. Analyses reveal the South Korean boyband BTS as one of the most significant driver of health discourse. Tweets from health agencies and prominent figures that mentioned K-pop generate 111 times more online responses compared to tweets that did not. These tweets also elicited strong responses from South America, Southeast Asia, and interior States—areas often neglected by mainstream social media campaigns. Network and temporal analysis show increased use from right-leaning elites over time. Mechanistically, strong-levels of parasocial engagement and connectedness allow sustained activism in the community. Our results suggest that public health institutions may leverage pre-existing audience markets to synergistically diffuse and target under-served communities both domestically and globally, especially during health crises.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000265; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100267; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173049083&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468696423000265; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100267
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know