Comparative study of bilateral total hip arthroplasty in one or two stages
Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, ISSN: 1877-0568, Vol: 108, Issue: 6, Page: 103359
2022
- 9Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef3
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Bilateral total hip arthroplasty (Bi THA) for disabling bilateral hip osteoarthritis can be performed in one or two operative sessions. The objective of this study was to compare the complication rates of a group of patients who had bilateral THA in one operating session (Bi-1S THA) to a matched group of patients who had bilateral THA in two separate operating sessions (Bi-2S THA). This retrospective case-control study compared 84 Bi-1S THA matched to 84 Bi-2S THA by age, gender, diagnosis, ASA score (1–2) and surgical approach. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Complication rates, total blood loss, number of blood transfusion units, and functional outcomes were assessed. Twelve patients (14.3%) in the Bi-1S THA group had minor or major complications, compared to twenty-one (25%) in the Bi-2S THA group ( p = 0.08): there were fewer minor complications in the Bi-1S THA group and a similar rate of major complications amongst the two groups. Total blood loss estimated using the OSTHEO formula was significantly lower in patients operated on by Bi-1S THA (1853 ± 753 mL versus 2804 ± 1012 mL, p <0.0001). The number of blood transfusion units was similar between the groups (0.5 ± 0.8 versus 0.3 ± 1.4 respectively, p = 0.55). No significant difference was found regarding the functional results. Under the conditions of this study, bilateral total hip arthroplasty in one operative session leads to fewer minor complications, and a similar rate of major complications, when compared to bilateral total hip arthroplasty in two separate sessions. This strategy can therefore be recommended for ASA 1 and 2 patients, under the age of 80 with disabling bilateral osteoarthritis. III, retrospective comparative study.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056822001864; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103359; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134234065&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781050; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877056822001864; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103359
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know