Latent inhibition, visual pop-out and schizotypy: is disruption of latent inhibition due to enhanced stimulus salience?
Personality and Individual Differences, ISSN: 0191-8869, Vol: 37, Issue: 7, Page: 1347-1358
2004
- 14Citations
- 44Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The disruption of latent inhibition (i.e. conditioning rate to a preexposed (PE) stimulus elevated to the level of a non-preexposed (NPE) stimulus) within the schizophrenia continuum has often been attributed to increased attentional distractibility by irrelevant stimuli. It has not been established, however, whether such a putative distractibility is due to a tendency to treat any stimulus as salient on the basis of physical characteristics (enhanced stimulus salience). In order to test this possibility, extreme schizotypy scorers were selected from a larger sample of undergraduate students to take part in a two-experimental investigation. In Experiment 1, latent inhibition, as assessed in a visual search paradigm, was disrupted in high-schizotypy scorers, but was intact for low-schizotypy scorers replicating past findings. In Experiment 2, no evidence for an enhanced stimulus salience, as assessed in a visual pop-out task, was found for high-schizotypy scorers. Accuracy rate for both high- and low-schizotypy scorers followed the hierarchically differentiated pattern of the stimulus salience level, failing to support the hypothesis that high-schizotypy scorers tend to treat any stimulus as salient on the basis of physical characteristics. The obtained results suggest that the disruption of latent inhibition in high-schizotypy scorers is not associated with a tendency to experience any event (i.e. both PE and NPE stimuli) as perceptually salient.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886904000157; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=4944226161&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886904000157; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know