Can a brief survey identify U.S. Army Soldiers who are behaviorally and genetically resilient to sleep loss?
Personality and Individual Differences, ISSN: 0191-8869, Vol: 195, Page: 111614
2022
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
There are replicable inter-individual differences in cognitive responsivity to sleep loss. Genetic allele variations have been linked with behavioral differences in cognitive performance under these conditions, yet less burdensome tests or screeners are not available. This study tested whether a survey can classify U.S. Army Soldiers as cognitively vulnerable or resilient to sleep loss and whether Soldiers in these differentiated groups have the expected allele variants. Six genetic targets were sequenced from 75 Soldiers. Cognition was tested after a night of total sleep deprivation during a military exercise. The Iowa Resilience to Sleeplessness Test (iREST) was administered. A Wilcoxon Rank Sum test showed the iREST score of 2.5/5 differentiated groups behaviorally on all cognitive tests. Chi-squared tests showed that for the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) gene, 82% of behaviorally vulnerable soldiers had alleles linked with vulnerability, compared with 41% of behaviorally genetic soldiers. If these findings are replicated, the iREST could be used to help military leaders make decisions about personnel placement when sleep loss is unavoidable.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886922001180; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111614; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129194196&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886922001180; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111614
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know