Following your heart: Cardiac autonomic modulation as a feature of decision-making under ambiguity and risk
Personality and Individual Differences, ISSN: 0191-8869, Vol: 226, Page: 112686
2024
- 1Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Decision-making requires a bidirectional flow of information from perception, emotion, and bodily behaviour. Heart rate variability (HRV) provides a non-invasive, cost-effective way to assess this connection. 112 healthy participants completed two established decision tasks under ambiguity and risk. Heart rate was continuously recorded at rest, during, and after task performance. To account for differences in cardiac modulation the sample was stratified by sex. Time, frequency, and non-linear HRV domains were selected to assess vagal modulation and sympatho-vagal balance. Vagally meditated HRV showed a pattern corresponding to a replenishment effect by increasing during decision-making in both tasks compared to rest, and then gradually returning to initial levels during recovery. This effect may indicate successful self-regulation, such as enhanced concentration, or emotional regulation. Regarding decision-making, women and men making disadvantageous decisions under ambiguity had higher vagally mediated HRV than those making advantageous decisions. Consistent with this finding are the results for decisions under risk for women. Contrary, men making disadvantageous decisions under risk, showed lower vagally mediated HRV than those making advantageous decisions. The results suggest that there are sex-specific differences to be investigated in the future. HRV analysis is an effective approach for differentiating somatic characteristics associated with decision-making performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924001466; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112686; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191300718&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886924001466; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112686
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know