L2T-DFM: Learning to Teach with Dynamic Fused Metric
Pattern Recognition, ISSN: 0031-3203, Vol: 159, Page: 111124
2025
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The loss function plays a crucial role in the construction of machine learning algorithms. Employing a teacher model to set loss functions dynamically for student models has attracted attention. In existing works, (1) the characterization of the dynamic loss suffers from some inherent limitations, ie, the computational cost of loss networks and the restricted similarity measurement handcrafted loss functions; and (2) the states of the student model are provided to the teacher model directly without integration, causing the teacher model to underperform when trained on insufficient amounts of data. To alleviate the above-mentioned issues, in this paper, we select and weigh a set of similarity metrics by a confidence-based selection algorithm and a temporal teacher model to enhance the dynamic loss functions. Subsequently, to integrate the states of the student model, we employ statistics to quantify the information loss of the student model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach can enhance student learning and improve the performance of various deep models on real-world tasks, including classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation scenarios.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320324008756; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2024.111124; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85208175866&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031320324008756; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2024.111124
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know