High accuracy of HLA-B*27 genotyping by allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction in a heterogeneous population compared to flow cytometry and single nucleotide polymorphism detection assays
Pathology, ISSN: 0031-3025, Vol: 52, Issue: 2, Page: 256-261
2020
- 5Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef5
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
HLA-B27 is a risk marker for ankylosing spondylitis and other associated seronegative spondyloarthropathies. We compared three methods of HLA-B*27 typing in a New South Wales (NSW) population: flow cytometry, rs4349859 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection assay, and allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of exons 2 and 3. Over a 5-month period, 543 samples underwent flow cytometric testing and RT-PCR high-resolution melt analysis of rs4349859 SNP and of exon 2 (5ʹ fragment) and exon 3. In the third method, positive samples were further analysed with fluorescent resonance emission transfer (FRET) RT-PCR of exon 2 fragments, 2a and 2b. HLA-B*27 and other genotypes were confirmed by Sanger sequencing of a 600 base pair fragment of exons 2 and 3. In our cohort, the rs4349859 SNP method had 78.6% sensitivity and 98.7% specificity. Screening with exon 2 (5ʹ fragment) and exon 3 RT-PCR provided 100% sensitivity. Further testing with exon 2a and 2b FRET RT-PCR produced 100% specificity. This cascade approach with allele-specific RT-PCR assays was able to differentiate all samples into HLA-B*27 subtypes. HLA-B*27 genotyping with allele-specific RT-PCR assays, to screen for and confirm HLA-B27 positive samples, was more sensitive and specific than flow cytometry and rs4349859 SNP assays. It is a potentially cost-effective method for differentiating HLA-B27 subtypes. Our cascade genetic testing approach is suitable for replacing the current flow cytometric HLA-B27 assay for the heterogeneous NSW population.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302519304295; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2019.09.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077328777&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902620; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031302519304295; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2019.09.013
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know