PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

High accuracy of HLA-B*27 genotyping by allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction in a heterogeneous population compared to flow cytometry and single nucleotide polymorphism detection assays

Pathology, ISSN: 0031-3025, Vol: 52, Issue: 2, Page: 256-261
2020
  • 5
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 21
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

HLA-B27 is a risk marker for ankylosing spondylitis and other associated seronegative spondyloarthropathies. We compared three methods of HLA-B*27 typing in a New South Wales (NSW) population: flow cytometry, rs4349859 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection assay, and allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of exons 2 and 3. Over a 5-month period, 543 samples underwent flow cytometric testing and RT-PCR high-resolution melt analysis of rs4349859 SNP and of exon 2 (5ʹ fragment) and exon 3. In the third method, positive samples were further analysed with fluorescent resonance emission transfer (FRET) RT-PCR of exon 2 fragments, 2a and 2b. HLA-B*27 and other genotypes were confirmed by Sanger sequencing of a 600 base pair fragment of exons 2 and 3. In our cohort, the rs4349859 SNP method had 78.6% sensitivity and 98.7% specificity. Screening with exon 2 (5ʹ fragment) and exon 3 RT-PCR provided 100% sensitivity. Further testing with exon 2a and 2b FRET RT-PCR produced 100% specificity. This cascade approach with allele-specific RT-PCR assays was able to differentiate all samples into HLA-B*27 subtypes. HLA-B*27 genotyping with allele-specific RT-PCR assays, to screen for and confirm HLA-B27 positive samples, was more sensitive and specific than flow cytometry and rs4349859 SNP assays. It is a potentially cost-effective method for differentiating HLA-B27 subtypes. Our cascade genetic testing approach is suitable for replacing the current flow cytometric HLA-B27 assay for the heterogeneous NSW population.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know