Genomic variability as a driver of plant–pathogen coevolution?
Current Opinion in Plant Biology, ISSN: 1369-5266, Vol: 18, Issue: 1, Page: 24-30
2014
- 87Citations
- 271Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations87
- Citation Indexes87
- 87
- CrossRef79
- Captures271
- Readers271
- 271
Review Description
Pathogens apply one of the strongest selective pressures in plant populations. Understanding plant–pathogen coevolution has therefore been a major research focus for at least sixty years [ 1 ]. Recent comparative genomic studies have revealed that the genes involved in plant defense and pathogen virulence are among the most polymorphic in the respective genomes. Which fraction of this diversity influences the host–pathogen interaction? Do coevolutionary dynamics maintain variation? Here we review recent literature on the evolutionary and molecular processes that shape this variation, focusing primarily on gene-for-gene interactions. In summarizing theoretical and empirical studies of the processes that shape this variation in natural plant and pathogen populations, we find a disconnect between the complexity of ecological interactions involving hosts and their myriad microbes, and the models that describe them.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526614000028; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.12.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84893420263&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24491596; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1369526614000028
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know