Genes and knowledge: Response to Baverstock, K. the gene an appraisal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.04.005
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, ISSN: 0079-6107, Vol: 167, Page: 12-17
2021
- 4Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef1
- Captures2
- Readers2
Review Description
This response aims to expand on some of the issues raised by Keith Baverstock's The Gene: An Appraisal, especially on the evolution and nature of knowledge in living things. In contrast to the simple associationism envisaged in “genetic information”, it emphasises the dynamic complexity and changeability of most natural environments, and, therefore, predictability based on underlying statistical structures. That seems to be the basis of the “cognitive” functions increasingly being reported about cellular, as well as more evolved, functions, and of the autonomous agency of organisms thriving creatively in complex environments.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610721001255; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.10.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118733044&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736965; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0079610721001255; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.10.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know