Predictors of knowledge and knowledge gain after decision aid use among women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants
Patient Education and Counseling, ISSN: 0738-3991, Vol: 124, Page: 108248
2024
- 33Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
To identify factors contributing to baseline knowledge in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) and knowledge gain after decision aid (DA) use. Women with PVs in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) receiving DAs or a control group (CG). Of the total sample, 417 completed the baseline survey and were included in this analysis. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted: baseline data on socio-demographic, medical, decision-related and psychological variables were used to identify predictors for (1) baseline knowledge within the total group and (2) knowledge gain within the IG after DA use three months post study inclusion. At baseline, higher education status, no breast cancer history, and lower decisional conflict related to higher knowledge within the total group. After DA use within the IG, higher baseline scores for decisional conflict predicted higher knowledge gain, and higher baseline scores for depression and intrusion predicted lower knowledge gain. This study identified predictors of baseline knowledge and knowledge gain after DA use in women with BRCA1/2 PVs. Awareness of facilitating and hindering factors on these women’s knowledge can improve understanding of their health literacy and enable further targeted support interventions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124001150; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108248; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188449241&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38513456; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0738399124001150; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108248
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know