Safety of native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in humans
Peptides, ISSN: 0196-9781, Vol: 177, Page: 171214
2024
- 1Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
In this systematic review, we assessed the safety and possible safety events of native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)(1−42) in human studies with administration of synthetic human GIP. We searched the PubMed database for all trials investigating synthetic human GIP(1−42) administration. A total of 67 studies were included. Study duration ranged from 30 min to 6 days. In addition to healthy individuals, the studies included individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, chronic pancreatitis and secondary diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, diabetes caused by a mutation in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha gene, end-stage renal disease, chronic renal insufficiency, critical illness, hypoparathyroidism, or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Of the included studies, 78 % did not mention safety events, 10 % of the studies reported that no safety events were observed in relation to GIP administration, and 15 % of the studies reported safety events in relation to GIP administration with most frequently reported event being a moderate and transient increased heart rate. Gastrointestinal safety events, and changes in blood pressure were also reported. Plasma concentration of active GIP(1−42) increased linearly with dose independent of participant phenotype. There was no significant correlation between achieved maximal concentration of GIP(1−42) and reported safety events. Clearance rates of GIP(1−42) were similar between participant groups. In conclusion, the available data indicate that GIP(1−42) in short-term (up to 6 days) infusion studies is generally well-tolerated. The long-term safety of continuous GIP(1−42) administration is unknown.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196978124000676; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171214; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190608671&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38615716; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196978124000676; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171214
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know