Predictions of permeability, surface area and average dissolution rate during reactive transport in multi-mineral rocks
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, ISSN: 0920-4105, Vol: 170, Page: 130-138
2018
- 45Citations
- 66Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The interactions between minerals and reactive fluids have great impact on the pore structure and hydrologic properties of rocks. A 3D pore-scale reactive transport model is applied to predict multi-mineral reactions in porous rocks. Eight mineral phases are distinguished in 2D slices of a reservoir sandstone by using Quantitative Evaluation of Minerals by SCANning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN) imaging technique. The 2D image is then registered into the corresponding cross-section of the 3D rock image obtained from micro-computed tomography (CT) scanning. Reactive transport with chemical dissolution is simulated directly on the 3D image of the sandstone. In the simulations, each mineral is assigned with a specific intrinsic reaction rate constant. The dissolution-induced changes in the pore structure are measured. The pore size distribution of the rock is analysed to investigate the evolution of the pore space. The changes of surface area and permeability are compared with single mineral simulations to illustrate the importance of mineralogical heterogeneity on reactive transport. The results show that the 3D pore-scale mineralogical heterogeneity causes overestimation of the permeability variations during reactive transport. The average effective dissolution rates for the rock are also measured. The simulations with single mineral assumptions present an overall reaction rate which is 10 times higher than the predictions with multi-mineral dissolution at the start of reactions. Relationships between average reaction rate and time are proposed to characterise the evolution of dissolution rate. A correction is also suggested to reduce the errors in predictions of reaction rates with single mineral assumptions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410518304947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048864786&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0920410518304947; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.010
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know