Data-driven approach for hydrocarbon production forecasting using machine learning techniques
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, ISSN: 0920-4105, Vol: 217, Page: 110757
2022
- 23Citations
- 71Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Main aspect of this study is to explore the possible use of Machine learning based approaches in the petroleum industry. The fourth industrial revolution is being ushered in by advances in computer power. The oil and gas sector contains a huge amount of produced oil data from wells that can be utilised to create data-driven models which can validate empirical correlations. This validation is vital in the current context because the oil market fluctuates a lot, thus making efficient judgments based on insights supplied by data science and machine learning algorithms are valuable. Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest Regressor (RF) and Gradient Boosting Regressor (GB) were used in this study to forecast daily oil production using available production parameters. In this study, the production data from Equinor's Volve Field was utilised. The obtained data was filtered, and then it was applied to mentioned algorithms with fine tuned hyperparameters. The data was split into training data (70%) and test data (30%). The model was constructed on training data then it was validated through test data. Seven parameters were chosen on the basis of magnitude of correlation coefficient. The result showed that even with the cases of several shut-ins, the hydrocarbon forecasting method for well 159-F-1C predicted production rates with a coefficient of determination (R 2 score) value greater or equal to 0.90. For performance analysis, coefficient of determination (R 2 score), mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used for the selected wells. The outcome showed that prediction of hydrocarbon production for well 15/9-F-1 C ANN model showed the best performance (R 2 score = 0.9, MAE = 20.52 and MSE = 1268) and for well 15/9-F-12 RF model shows the best performance (R 2 score = 0.98, MAE = 84.95 and MSE = 37356.07). This novel approach could be trained on any dataset to assist in oil forecasting.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522006192; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110757; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135294288&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0920410522006192; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110757
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know