Comment on “A statistical evidence of power law distribution in the upper tail of world billionaires’ data 2010–20” [Physica A 581 (2021) 126198]
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, ISSN: 0378-4371, Vol: 589, Page: 126637
2022
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
In a recently published paper in Physica A it is claimed the statistical evidence of having a power law distribution in the upper tail of the world billionaires’ data in the period 2010–20. We address (almost) the same data sets, with the same truncation points in the data, and obtain two main conclusions. Firstly, both the truncated lognormal and the power law or Pareto distributions might be improved in principle to describe the upper tails’ data to the level of quality of recent studies for other types of data, as the Anderson–Darling test yields rejection of both distributions almost always. Secondly, the truncated lognormal is statistically comparable or even better to the Pareto by different criteria, formal and graphical.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437121008840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126637; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120922177&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378437121008840; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126637
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know