Refining the diffusive compressible Euler model
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, ISSN: 0378-4371, Vol: 635, Page: 129474
2024
- 3Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We revisit the molecular arguments underpinning the diffusive compressible Euler model (proposed in Svärd (2018)), and conclude that a heat diffusive term is not accounted for in the energy equation of the original model. The new heat diffusive term complements the diffusion of the conserved variables already present in the model. By studying a diffusive and conductive heat transfer problem, we quantify the new term in the updated model and evaluate it in the context sound attenuation. Although the new diffusive term is important for certain problems, we also demonstrate that it has a negligible effect on the aerodynamic validation cases that the original model has already successfully passed. Furthermore, the updated system is compatible with the weak well-posedness that has previously been established for the original system.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437123010294; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129474; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183472333&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378437123010294; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129474
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know