BiFeO 3 /BiVO 4 nanocomposite photocatalysts with highly enhanced photocatalytic activity for rhodamine B degradation under visible light irradiation
Physica B: Condensed Matter, ISSN: 0921-4526, Vol: 561, Page: 23-28
2019
- 50Citations
- 46Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, the BiFeO 3 /BiVO 4 nanocomposite photocatalysts were successfully synthesized by the homogeneous precipitation method followed with the hydrothermal method. The characteristics of as-prepared photocatalysts were measured by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET), Photoluminescence (PL) and UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV–vis DRS) techniques. The photocatalytic activity of rhodamine B (RhB) with the photocatalysts was estimated by the visible light irradiation. The experimental results were found that a mole ratio of 0.5:0.5 of BiFeO 3 :BiVO 4 exhibited the highest photocatalytic performance as compared with other photocatalysts. More importantly, BiFeO 3 decorated on the BiVO 4 surface to form a composite, resulting in its large surface area and enhanced photoabsorption to the visible light regions. Moreover, it also was synergistic with the BiVO 4 to hinder the rapid recombination of electron-hole pairs. The stability and recyclability of 0.5BiFeO 3 /0.5BiVO 4 were also tested by five recycling runs, and the addition of the radical scavengers in the photodegradation process of RhB under visible light irradiation was detected through trapping experiments. The results were found that hydroxyl radicals (OH • ) and holes (h + ) was the major active species, which had a considerable part of RhB degradation. The photocatalytic mechanism of BiFeO 3 /BiVO 4 nanocomposite photocatalysts was also discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921452619301383; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.02.049; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062689810&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921452619301383; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0921452619301383?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0921452619301383?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.02.049
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know