Electron beam energy slicing performance in laser wakefield acceleration
Physics Letters A, ISSN: 0375-9601, Vol: 453, Page: 128482
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The first stage of electron acceleration, the plasma cathode, is a key part of LWFA. Output parameters of this stage such as beam charge, mean energy, energy spread, and emittance can be varied in a rather broad range depending on laser pulse and gas target conditions. These parameters are usually evaluated via particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. However, if an essential improvement of the beam quality could be further performed with a conventional beamline, the selection of an acceleration regime, including laser pulse and gas target characteristics, should be done taking into account not only PIC simulations but also beam transport simulations. Here is shown that improvements of electron beam quality via energy slicing using magneto-optics (MO) may become an important step in developing full-optical electron accelerators and radiation devices. Since the typical energy of electrons presently achieves sub-GeV in a single acceleration stage, the elaboration of slicing techniques for quasi-mono-energetic, high density LWFA beams is of particular interest. Depending on the efficiency of beam slicing the reverse problem of initial beam energy distribution and, therefore, a proper acceleration regime can be solved. An efficient slicing may allow operation with broader beam energy spreads, higher charges, and getting better stability in contrast to narrower beam energy spreads requiring far more precise control over laser and gas target parameters. Even though this technique has been used in classical particle accelerators, its limitations have not been well studied in LWFA with their less stable beams. MO slicing is explored numerically with use of realistic LWFA electron beams obtained from 3D PIC simulations at various target parameters.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960122005643; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128482; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140141934&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0375960122005643; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128482
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know