The superior mechanical and physical properties of nanocarbon reinforced bulk composites achieved by architecture design – A review
Progress in Materials Science, ISSN: 0079-6425, Vol: 113, Page: 100672
2020
- 230Citations
- 160Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Nanocarbon materials, such as carbon nanotube and graphene, are reckoned as the ideal reinforcement for composites due to their extraordinary intrinsic properties. However, the commonly-used homogenous architecture could not guarantee an effective enhancement in the mechanical and physical properties and become the major technological barrier for practical applications. Fabrication of nanocarbon reinforced composites with special architecture such as laminate, alignment and network architecture has been reported to break through the limitations and improve the overall performance of the composites. In this review, we aim to: (1) systematically summarize the current preparation methods to achieve different types of architecture design in three classes of matrices (polymer, ceramic and metal); (2) analyze the mechanisms and the influence factors for the mechanical and physical properties (electrical and thermal conductivities) of the composites with different architecture types. Finally, we outline the main advances and outlooks for architecture design in nanocarbon reinforced composites.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079642520300360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100672; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084187969&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0079642520300360; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100672
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know