Energy-efficient mobile target detection in Wireless Sensor Networks with random node deployment and partial coverage
Pervasive and Mobile Computing, ISSN: 1574-1192, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: 429-447
2012
- 47Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper addresses the problem of engineering energy-efficient target detection applications, using unattended Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with random node deployment and partial coverage, for long-lasting surveillance of areas of interest. As battery energy depletion is a crucial issue, an effective approach consists in switching on and off, according to proper duty cycles, sensing and communication modules of wireless sensor nodes. Making these modules work in an intermittent fashion has an impact on (i) the latency of notification transmission (depending on the communication duty cycle), (ii) the probability of missed target detection (depending on the number of deployed nodes, the sensing duty cycle, and the number of incoming targets), and (iii) the delay in detecting an incoming target. In order to optimize the system parameters to reach given performance objectives, we first derive an analytical framework which allows us to evaluate the probability of missed target detection (in the presence of either single or multiple incoming targets), the notification transmission latency, the detection delay, and the network lifetime. Then, we show how this “toolbox” can be used to optimally configure system parameters under realistic performance constraints.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574119211000290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.02.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84861198400&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1574119211000290; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1574119211000290?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1574119211000290?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.02.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know