Substrate vs. free surface: Competing effects on the glass transition of polymer thin films
Polymer, ISSN: 0032-3861, Vol: 54, Issue: 21, Page: 5942-5951
2013
- 86Citations
- 71Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The glass-transition temperature ( T g ) of polymer thin films can be strongly influenced by the combined effects of the supporting solid substrate and the free surface. The relative importance of these two effects, which often compete with each other, depends on the strength of the substrate–film interactions. Utilizing an atomistically informed coarse-grained model for poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), here we uncover the relationship between the substrate–film interfacial energy and the spatial distribution of T g across thin films. We find that above a critical interfacial energy, the linear dependence of film T g on the interfacial energy breaks down and film T g attains an asymptotic value. Analyses on the spatial variation of T g across the thin film reveal that the short-range interface near the cohesive surface generates a long-range interphase that leads a spatially uniform appreciation of T g throughout the film, unlike weakly cohesive surfaces that show sharp gradients along the depth of film. These findings explain recent experiments and reveal a versatile approach for tuning film T g via engineered substrate-film interactions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032386113007532; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84885020941&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032386113007532; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0032386113007532?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0032386113007532?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.013
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know