Physical characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone via laser micrometry: Porosity and condition-dependent jet instabilities
Polymer, ISSN: 0032-3861, Vol: 211, Page: 123044
2020
- 4Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Electrospinning has acquired intense recent interest as a means of advancing filtration, tissue engineering, and catalysis. As a part of this evolution, better characterization of electrospinning conditions has been identified as a variable that can improve performance. We use a unique realization of laser micrometry to reveal previously unknown porosity trends within electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) deposited onto a cylindrical mandrel. Electrostatic charging of two PCL-based solutions took place in N 2 at 0 and 50%RH under three collector biases (−5, 0, and +5 kV). At 0%RH, all three gave rise to porosity values of 85–95%, where 95% occurred at the edges of +5 kV; mid-point values were a relatively constant 86–90%. Increases to 50%RH at –5 kV caused edge porosity values of ~56%; mid-point values were ~91% due to a well-defined ‘texture.’ The addition of higher dielectric constant Rose Bengal (RB) caused minor porosity changes at 0%RH, but dramatic changes at 50%RH; mid-points were as low as 12%; edge values reached >80% before decreasing to ~60%. Dense fiber agglomerations were present due to RB's effect on surface charge migration and decreased fiber repulsion along with deposit relaxation likely due to increased solvent retention. Multi-needle depositions of separate PCL and PCL-RB solutions at 0%RH produced a visually uniform, ~90% porous deposition. However, RB analysis showed separated contributions containing either RB-rich or RB-poor fibers. At 50%RH, midpoint porosities decreased to 0% and similar RB-poor or RB-rich regions occurred where 0% was associated with RB likely due to jet segregation due to differences in the grounding ability of PCL versus PCL-RB solutions. This analysis captures variations in through-thickness porosity to provide unprecedented detail regarding conditional effects on electrospun products.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032386120308697; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123044; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091992651&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032386120308697; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0032386120308697?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0032386120308697?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123044
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know