Changes in bacterial loads, gas composition, volatile organic compounds, and glucosinolates of fresh bagged Ready-To-Eat rocket under different shelf life treatment scenarios
Postharvest Biology and Technology, ISSN: 0925-5214, Vol: 148, Page: 107-119
2019
- 18Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Temperature abuse and improper shelf life treatment of Ready-to-Eat wild rocket is a leading cause of product quality losses and consumer rejection. It can cause the deterioration of appearance, the build-up of bacterial numbers, and the production of off-odours. This study subjected commercially produced and processed bags of wild rocket to various temperature and shelf life duration treatments that could hypothetically be experienced by a consumer, purchasing bags from supermarkets that have suffered cold-chain breaches. We take a unique experimental perspective that accounts for potential temperature variation scenarios within supermarkets and the home. Bacterial counts, volatile organic chemical production, glucosinolate concentration, and internal bag atmosphere composition were measured under these temperature scenarios and across growing seasons. Our results showed that the season of purchase significantly affects wild rocket respiration and bacterial loads. Prolonged high temperature abuses increased microbial loads, disulfide abundance, and reduced content of the glucosinolate glucoerucin. Short temperature abuse treatments resulted in no significant changes in bacterial numbers, providing bags were returned to cool-chain conditions. Samples stored under these conditions (<5 °C) saw no significant changes. The effect of growth season also significantly affects wild rocket respiration. Summer-grown produce had high bacterial loads, but winter-grown had a higher respiration rates. These data illustrate the importance of maintaining cold-chain conditions for wild rocket to preserve key glucosinolate compounds and prevent sulfide formation via bacterial propagation and anaerobic respiration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925521418307798; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.10.021; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056471944&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925521418307798; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.10.021
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know