Role of liquid and solid particles in solid-liquid mixed fluxes on sulfur removal from molten iron under centrifugal stirring by an impeller
Powder Technology, ISSN: 0032-5910, Vol: 396, Page: 1-12
2022
- 8Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Process for removal of S from molten iron alloy is successfully established process in these days, e.g. Kanbara Reactor (KR) process. However, its operating mechanism needs to be understood in a more clear manner. A series of laboratory-scale experiments using lime–fluorspar flux, which is a solid particle-liquid mixture at the reaction temperature, were carried out in order to find out effects of composition, total mass, the liquid fraction ( f L ), order of injection of the flux, and centrifugal stirring on the reaction performance. Theoretical calculations for the phase diagram of the flux system, flux-molten iron reaction equilibria, and the reaction rate considering flux detachment/aggregation in case of the centrifugal stirring were carried out. It was concluded that (1) major S-absorbing phase should be the liquid phase in the flux, (2) increasing the f L enhances the reaction performance when the molten iron was desulfurized without the stirring, (3) the centrifugal mechanical stirring enhances the reaction rate, but it was not effective when f L is high, (4) the centrifugal mechanical stirring for solid particle-liquid mixed flux significantly affects the interfacial reaction area: enlarging the area by the detachment of the flux and contracting the area by aggregation. The f L, therefore, influences not only the volume of the S-absorbing part of the flux, but also the degree of detachment/aggregation, which depends on the physico-chemical properties of the flux. Optimum f L may be determined by the physico-chemical properties and degree of the stirring. An index for assessing DeS performance was used to reveal the role of f L and the mechanical stirring. It shows that the mechanical stirring could enhance the DeS performance without the unnecessary increase of liquid fraction of the flux, by adding fluorspar in the present case.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032591021009153; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.034; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118362512&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032591021009153; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.034
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know