Congo-São Francisco craton in Paleoproterozoic-Mesoproterozoic supercontinent Nuna
Precambrian Research, ISSN: 0301-9268, Vol: 406, Page: 107380
2024
- 3Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The location of the Congo-São Francisco (CSF) craton, one of the largest cratons in Proterozoic paleogeography, has been poorly constrained for the supercontinent Nuna interval (ca. 1800–1300 Ma). Initial models of Nuna suggested that the CSF craton was part of the Atlantica continent, together with Amazonia, West Africa, and perhaps Río de la Plata, as a separate continental block from other Nuna constituents. In other Nuna models the CSF craton has been placed adjacent to Baltica and Siberia, the core of Nuna, based mainly on ages of mafic magmatism and sparse paleomagnetic data. Through a geochemical, geochronological and paleomagnetic study of the WNW-trending Virei mafic dykes, which extend outward from the Mesoproterozoic Kunene Igneous Complex in southwest Angola, we provide a U-Pb baddeleyite age of 1385 ± 5 Ma, geochemical signatures, and a robust Mesoproterozoic paleomagnetic pole to test the CSF craton’s placement within Nuna. Including our new pole with quality-filtered poles from the other cratons during the Nuna interval, we propose a refined Nuna model with (1) southwest Congo / west Siberia cratonic connection at 1700–1500 Ma, (2) proximity of Amazonia and West Africa cratons, and (3) connection of southwest Congo craton with northwest West Africa at 1380 Ma. Our proposed 1500–1380 Ma reconstructions are further supported by matching large igneous province (LIP) records from these crustal blocks. The new 1385 Ma Virei pole, when considered relative to an earlier CSF pole at ca. 1500 Ma, requires substantial azimuthal rotation (∼85°) of CSF in the intervening time interval. To accommodate both the matching LIP records and paleomagnetic data from CSF and neighboring cratons in Nuna, we propose an interval of transform motion near the supercontinent’s periphery prior to more widespread mid-Mesoproterozoic supercontinental breakup.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824000937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107380; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189806515&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301926824000937; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107380
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know