Interval model validation for rotor support system using Kmeans Bayesian method
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, ISSN: 0266-8920, Vol: 70, Page: 103364
2022
- 5Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To identify the uncertain stiffness and damping of the rotor support system, and obtain the most credible interval parameters, an interval model validation for rotor support system using Kmeans Bayesian method is proposed. Interval model updating is transformed into interval lower bound and interval diameter determination. The minimization of discrepancies between predicted and experimental data is converted into minimizing the area between the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the errors and CDF of 0. To improve the computational efficiency, the long short-term memory (LSTM) network is constructed to denote the mapping relationship between the unbalance response and support parameters. To obtain the most credible interval, the Kmeans clustering algorithm is combined with the Bayesian method to select the interval bounds with maximum credibility. Kmeans clustering algorithm is used to reduce the number of reconstructed errors while utilizing all the information on reconstruction errors. Bayesian method is used to calculate the credibility of the interval bounds. The performance of the proposed method is validated by a gas-generator rotor and a dual-disks rotor. Results show that the proposed method is effective for model validation of the rotor support parameters.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892022000972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103364; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138761097&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266892022000972; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103364
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know