Impact of scalar mixing uncertainty on the predictions of reactor-based closures: Application to a lifted methane/air jet flame
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, ISSN: 1540-7489, Vol: 39, Issue: 4, Page: 5165-5175
2023
- 8Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This work is devoted to quantify the predictive uncertainty in RANS simulation of a non-premixed lifted flame due to uncertainty in the model parameters of the scalar dissipation rate transport equation. The uncertainty propagation and the global sensitivity analysis of the effect of such parameters on the quantities of interest (QoIs) is performed employing Polynomial Chaos Expansions as surrogate models of the uncertain response. This approach is applied on a lifted methane-air jet flame in vitiated coflow, already experimentally investigated by Cabra et al [1]. The results show the effectiveness of the approach to provide predictions with estimates of uncertainty. It is shown that the the uncertainty in the mixture fraction and temperature is negligible as long as only pure mixing happens, then it becomes significant in the regions where ignition begins, starting from z/D=30. Of the four parameters considered, i.e., CD1, CD2, CP1 and CP2, main and total effect sensitivity indices show that the largest contribution to the uncertainty in the flame temperature is given by the two dissipation parameters CD1 and CD2, while the production parameter CP2 has almost negligible impact on the predictions. Lastly, the surrogate models are used to determine an optimum set of parameters that minimizes the distance with the experimental measures, leading to improved predictions of the QoIs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748922000396; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2022.06.028; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136143898&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1540748922000396; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2022.06.028
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know