‘In-situ’ Inspection Technologies: Trends in Degradation Assessment and Associated Technologies
Procedia CIRP, ISSN: 2212-8271, Vol: 59, Page: 35-40
2017
- 10Citations
- 47Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The advent of advanced, innovative and complex engineered systems has established new technologies that are far more superior and perform well even in harsh environments. It is well established that such next generation systems need to be maintained regularly to prevent any catastrophic failure as a result of regular wear and tear. Non-destructive and structural monitoring technologies have been supporting maintenance activities for over a century and industries still continue to rely on such technologies for effective degradation assessment. Maintenance ‘in-situ’ has been adopted for decades where the health of system or component needs to be inspected in its natural environment, especially those safety critical systems that need in-field inspection to determine its health. This paper presents selective case studies adopted in the area of damage assessment that qualify for both field and ‘in-situ’ inspection. The future directions in the applicability of traditional and advanced inspection techniques to inspect multiple materials and in the area of inaccessible area degradation assessment have also been presented as part of this study.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221282711630988X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017442691&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221282711630988X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S221282711630988X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S221282711630988X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know