Teaching Axiomatic Design for a Long-Term Sustainable Introduction of Industry 4.0 in SMEs
Procedia CIRP, ISSN: 2212-8271, Vol: 96, Page: 169-174
2021
- 6Citations
- 153Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This work shows how to teach axiomatic design (AD) of manufacturing processes and systems in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to achieve long-term sustainability in the introduction of Industry 4.0. This is about how to develop profitable and ethical design solutions by exploiting emerging technologies, especially for companies with limited resources. Suh’s axiomatic approach to design selects the best solution among plausible candidates early in the design process so that resources can be focused most effectively. It is important that engineers know how to develop ethical design solutions efficiently and effectively. Sustainability rests on three pillars, economic, ecological and social. Therefore, ethical design can be achieved, with responsible use of natural resources and protection of the environment, meeting the needs of people and society as well as profitability to ensure long-term prosperity for all. Literature on Industry 4.0 shows several approaches on how Industry 4.0 can be sustainable and human-centered. However, few works focus on SMEs and there is little on teaching. Here, AD is used to create a program for teaching how to apply AD to design problems in the context of Industry 4.0 for SMEs. AD theory states that the best design solutions are those that, 1- maintain the independence of the functional elements, and 2- minimize the information content, i.e., maximize the probability of success. In AD, needs of customers and other stake holders are considered first, so that the right problems are addressed. Then top-down, parallel, functional-physical decompositions, are followed by physical integrations, all guided by Suh’s axioms to select the right solutions. In order to test new technologies in a practice-oriented way in advance of introduction for SMEs, learning factory laboratories are used.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827121001864; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.155; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101069534&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212827121001864; https://zenodo.org/record/6985158; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.155
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know