Challenges of prospective life cycle assessment of emerging recycling processes: case study of battery materials recovery
Procedia CIRP, ISSN: 2212-8271, Vol: 116, Page: 23-28
2023
- 1Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
The aim of recycling is not only to preserve raw materials within a circular economy but also to enable a decreased environmental impact by secondary production of materials compared to primary production and other end-of-life options. In order to ensure the sound development of emerging recycling processes from an environmental perspective, the method of life cycle assessment (LCA) should be applied from the early stage on. While several frameworks for prospective LCA of emerging technologies have been proposed in recent years, existing approaches are not intended for application to recycling processes. Therefore, this paper analyses the specific challenges in the LCA of emerging recycling processes as for example varying material quality, definition of system boundaries or handling of by-products in combination with changing process chains and lack of available data. Initial methodological recommendations are given and selectively applied to the use case of Lithium-ion battery recycling. Two emerging recycling processes are evaluated assessing the environmental impacts of battery graphite recovery by flotation combined with leaching and of re-synthesis of cathode active materials using hydrometallurgical processes. The assessment results approve the importance of methodological choice within the LCA of emerging recycling processes and its influence on the further process development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827123000094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164302251&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212827123000094; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know