A Data and Knowledge-driven framework of the intelligent process design for special-shaped features of complex aviation parts
Procedia CIRP, ISSN: 2212-8271, Vol: 119, Page: 414-420
2023
- 1Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
While the safety and reliability of aviation equipment are directly determined by the performance of complex aviation parts, these kinds of components still contain lots of special-shaped features, which refer to the machining features that need to be completed by unique process and non-standard cutting tools. In addition, the traditional process design of special-shaped features of complex aviation parts (SFCAP) heavily relies on manual experience, which leads to low machining efficiency and unstable machining quality. To solve this problem, this paper takes SFCAP as the study object and proposes a framework of intelligent process design, which can effectively guarantee the processing quality to support the performance of complex aviation equipment by realizing active adaptive adjustment, rapid iteration, and upgrading of process planning based on the machining data and relative knowledge. Four key-enabling technologies are set forth to support the design, which include the special-shaped feature-process knowledge mapping model, 3D feature recognition and geometric parameter extraction, knowledge uncertainty-based evaluation, and digital twin-based verification and optimization. What's more, the benefits and challenges of the design are analyzed, and the contribution and deficiencies are given at the end of this paper.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827123005048; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.145; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85169934314&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212827123005048; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.145
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know