Data Ecosystem for Industrial Product- Service Systems (IPS 2 ) Based on a Decentralized Data Architecture
Procedia CIRP, ISSN: 2212-8271, Vol: 119, Page: 1228-1233
2023
- 1Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS 2 ) confront design organizations with new challenges. One of those is the need for co-designing products with services, and their underlying service provider and supplier networks including the business models driving their cooperation for value delivery to the end users. In this context, data collected about all the organizations involved in IPS 2 design and delivery are becoming increasingly valuable assets for both, the design as well as the continuous improvement, adaptation, and optimization of IPS 2. In today's company IT infrastructures, data is typically managed in centralized data warehouses or data lakes. In order to cope with the dynamic nature of IPS 2 design and operation, agile de-centralized data organizations would be appropriate. Qualitative statements about the feasibility of some decentralized architectures realized with data mesh principles are given from practical use cases. This work focuses on a decentralized data architecture to enabling IPS 2 design and operation. Therefore, this work investigates the related challenges from centralized databases and proposes a decentralized concept solution tackling the requirements data privacy, data traceability, data accountability and data usability for the use case of a Mobility as a Service (MaaS) data ecosystem. For this purpose, compared to existing use cases, modern technology solutions such as blockchain technology and smart contracts are integrated in the concept.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827123006339; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.190; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85169880891&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212827123006339; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.190
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know