The development of crowdfunding in Poland in the years 2012-2022
Procedia Computer Science, ISSN: 1877-0509, Vol: 225, Page: 1582-1591
2023
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
The aim of the article is to identify and evaluate the operation of crowdfunding platforms in Poland in 2012 - 2022. The research covered crowdfunding platforms in the donation and equity model, with an emphasis on equity crowdfunding platforms. In order to verify the hypothesis, the author used inductive-deductive inference and desk research analysis. The Polish crowdfunding market is fragmented. Between 2011 and 2022, several dozen platforms were created, some of which remained inactive (no fundraising took place on them), and several collections took place on some. The dominant model of crowdfunding on platforms was and still is donation crowdfunding. The prospects for the development of donation crowdfunding are huge, because it meets real needs. There are and will be many people who need help, and on the other side there are people who have the opportunity to help and want to do it. A rapid increase in equity crowdfunding (more platforms, more issues, more companies) was also in the resent years observed. The development prospects for the equity crowdfunding have also changed. An important step was to regulate and supervise the market.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050923013054; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.147; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183564161&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877050923013054; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.147
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know