A survey of current practices in data management education in nursing doctoral programs
Journal of Professional Nursing, ISSN: 8755-7223, Vol: 37, Issue: 1, Page: 155-162
2021
- 8Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Captures44
- Readers44
- 44
Article Description
The inclusion of data management instruction within nursing doctoral curricula has not been systematically examined. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of data management education within nursing doctoral programs. Separate surveys were created for DNP (332) and PhD (138) program directors. Survey questions were based on the stages of the UK Data Service Research Data Lifecycle. One hundred and four nursing doctoral program directors responded, a 22% response rate. Sixty-seven (64%) were from DNP programs while 37 (35%) were from PhD programs. Although program directors reported that they were teaching stages of the research data lifecycle, data management is mostly being taught through individual mentoring or a single lecture within a required course, and that students' project data were not being preserved. Nursing doctoral programs need to develop consistent data management education, build an awareness of data policies, and clarify student project data sharing and ownership.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722320301204; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.06.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087786028&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674086; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S8755722320301204; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.06.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know