Fatigue behaviour of additively-manufactured metallic parts
Procedia Structural Integrity, ISSN: 2452-3216, Vol: 7, Page: 3-10
2017
- 34Citations
- 115Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
An overview on recent research efforts is presented to obtain an understanding on the fatigue behaviour and failure mechanisms of metallic parts fabricated via powder-based additive manufacturing (AM) processes, including direct energy deposition (DED) and powder bed fusion (PBF) methods, utilizing either laser or electron beam as an energy source. Some challenges inherent to characterizing the mechanical behaviour of AM metals under cyclic loading are discussed, with emphasis on the effects of residual stresses on their fatigue resistance. In addition, an aspect pertaining to the structural integrity of AM parts relating to their fatigue behaviour at very high cycles is presented and compared with those of the conventionally-manufactured counterparts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321617304031; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.053; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051602758&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452321617304031; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.053
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know