Performance investigation of a tubular distiller using parabolic concentrator with various modifications
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, ISSN: 0957-5820, Vol: 179, Page: 537-545
2023
- 20Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this experimental study, two units are held and studied: the traditional tubular solar still (TTSS) and the developed tubular solar still (DTSS). The influence of a developed solar parabolic concentrator (DSPC) employed with carbon black nanoparticles (CBNs), a V-corrugated Aluminum basin (VCAB), and wick martial on the thermal efficiency and productivity was investigated in four cases: (Case A): DTSS with DSPC, (Case B): DTSS with DSPC and CBNs, (Case C): DTSS with DSPC and V-corrugated Aluminum basin (VCAB), and CBNs, (Case D): DTSS with DSPC and VCAB and CBNs by using factors such as air temperature, cover temperature, water temperature, air speed, and sun radiation. It was found that case four was the best case, where it had the highest hourly efficiency at 18:0 for each of the traditional unit and the modified unit, and that the energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, and daily productivity increased by 129.8%, 365.44%, and 120.536%, respectively, compared to the traditional unit, its cost, which was 0.026$, was reduced by 23%.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582023008352; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.09.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171806151&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957582023008352; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.09.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know