Co-pyrolysis of phenolic printed circuit boards with CaO and Ca(OH) 2 mixture in a fluidized bed reactor: Optimization of the operating conditions and the kinetic analysis
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, ISSN: 0957-5820, Vol: 188, Page: 735-748
2024
- 1Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In a previous study (Haghi et al., 2023), we demonstrated that co-pyrolysis of paper-laminated phenolic PCB (FR2-PCB) with a mixture of CaO and Ca(OH) 2 in a fluidized bed reactor results in the simultaneous enhancement of the production of the pyrolysis oil and a significant decrease in its halide content. To advance the utilization of a blend of CaO and Ca(OH) 2 for scaling up the pyrolysis of FR2-PCB beyond laboratory-scale pyrolyzers, especially in fluidized bed reactors renowned for their effectiveness in large-scale pyrolysis of polymeric materials, the optimal operating conditions, as well as the kinetic parameters in the presence of CaO and Ca(OH) 2 should be explored. To this end, this study focuses on optimizing the temperature ( T ), retention time ( t ), and PCB-to-additive ratio (FR2/A) as the parameters controlling the co-pyrolysis of paper-laminated phenolic PCB (FR2-PCB) with a 50:50 mixture of CaO and Ca(OH) 2 in a fluidized bed reactor. According to the results of the experiments designed based on the response surface methodology, the maximum recovery of pyrolysis oil (40.6 %) was obtained at T = 620 °C, t = 22 min, and FR2/A= 5.4 g/g. Additional tests were carried out to explore the impact of CaO+Ca(OH) 2 concentration on the halogen content of the pyrolysis products. Furthermore, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed to investigate the influence of the tested additives on the pyrolysis behavior and the kinetic characteristics of FR2-PCB. By employing three iso-conversional model-free approaches, i.e., the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS), Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), and Starink integral methods, it was found that adding CaO+Ca(OH) 2 to FR2-PCB can reduce the activation energy of the pyrolysis reactions by 20 %.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024006578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.05.135; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195200573&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957582024006578; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.05.135
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know