Several models combined with ultrasound techniques to predict breast muscle weight in broilers
Poultry Science, ISSN: 0032-5791, Vol: 102, Issue: 10, Page: 102911
2023
- 4Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef2
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
The weight of breast muscle ( WBM ) is a highly monitored indicator in broiler breeding that can be obtained after slaughtering. Currently, due to the lack of accurate in vivo phenotypes for both genomic and phenotypic selection, genetic gains in WBM fall short of initial expectations. In this study, 1,006 market-age (42 d) broilers from 3 generations over 2 yr were randomly selected, and the breast width ( BW ), fossil bone length ( FBL ), breast muscle thickness ( BMT ), and live weight ( LW ) were measured exactly in vivo. Eight models, including multiple linear regression ( MLR ), ridge regression ( RR ), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator ( LASSO ), and elastic net ( EN ), were fitted to explore the best regression relationships between breast muscle weight and these indicators. Support vector machine ( SVM ) methods with both linear kernels and radial kernels were used to fit the models, while 2 decision tree-based machine learning algorithms, random forest ( RF ), and extreme gradient boosting ( XGBoost ), were used to establish the prediction model. The predictive effects of different combinations of independent variables were compared, leading to the conclusion that the EN model achieves the best predictive power when all 4 live features are used as inputs and is slightly better than the other models ( R 2 = 0.7696). This method could be applied in practical production and breeding work, leading to substantial cost savings and enhancements in the breeding process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123004303; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102911; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165617672&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37494808; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032579123004303; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102911
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know