PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Assessing physical activity through questionnaires – A consensus of best practices and future directions

Psychology of Sport and Exercise, ISSN: 1469-0292, Vol: 50, Page: 101715
2020
  • 81
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 121
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 12
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    81
    • Citation Indexes
      81
  • Captures
    121
  • Social Media
    12
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      12
      • Facebook
        12

Review Description

Questionnaires to assess physical activity (PA) have served and continue to serve important purposes in both research and practical application as they capture the self-reported aggregation of the individual which is at times complemented with device-based measures. This paper presents an expert consensus on best practices and future directions regarding the use of PA questionnaires (PAQ). The expert panel discussions that informed this manuscript took place during the 2nd International Workshop of the Center for the Assessment of Physical Activity (CAPA), held in Karlsruhe, Germany in July of 2019. Practically, we recommend to identify already existing and published PAQs in order to address a specific research question. To facilitate this, a decision framework (decision guide aide) for selecting a PAQ, consisting of purpose, construct, measurement unit, recall period, population, setting, measurement quality, feasibility/ease of use, and resources is presented. These best practices are discussed to provide some standardization for the field. With regard to future research on PAQs, continued efforts to improve validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change; consider the recall period; incorporate information on or adapt for a specific cultural/ethnic/environmental context; and strategically combine PAQ with other PA assessment methods capitalizing on the advancement of technology, are needed. These recommended future directions are outlined in order to motivate and challenge researchers to continually improve the field of PAQ research.

Bibliographic Details

Claudio R. Nigg; Reinhard Fuchs; Markus Gerber; Darko Jekauc; Theresa Koch; Janina Krell-Roesch; Sonia Lippke; Carina Mnich; Bernhard Novak; Qianqian Ju; Matteo C. Sattler; Steffen C.E. Schmidt; Mireille van Poppel; Anne K. Reimers; Petra Wagner; Catherine Woods; Alexander Woll

Elsevier BV

Psychology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know