Normal hip strength and range of motion values in youth and adult female national football teams: Data from 504 assessments
Physical Therapy in Sport, ISSN: 1466-853X, Vol: 69, Page: 51-58
2024
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Article Description
To determine normal hip adduction- and abduction strength and range of motion (ROM) values for youth and adult female national team football players, and evaluate if increasing age, playing position and leg dominance were associated with these strength and ROM values. Cohort study. National football center. 344 unique asymptomatic female football players. Hip internal/external rotation (°), Bent Knee Fall Out test (cm), hip adduction/abduction strength(N) and ratio, and normalised hip adduction/abduction torque (Nm/kg). A total of 504 assessments were performed. A total of 107 players underwent two (n = 67), three (n = 27) or four (n = 13) assessments. Mean peak hip adduction strength was 39% greater in 20 + Y old players 170 (±53 N) than in 13Y old players 122 (±28 N). Normalised hip adduction torque was 9% greater: 2.5 (±0.8Nm/kg) versus 2.3 (±0.5Nm/kg). A positive association between age and all strength measurements was found, while a negative association between age and hip external rotation and total hip rotation was found. No clinically relevant differences were found for the associations between playing position, leg dominance and hip strength- and ROM values. Normal values for hip strength and range of motion in youth and adult female national football players are presented that can be used as clinical reference values.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000671; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198701108&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39032327; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466853X24000671; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know