In vivo measurements in pediatric computed tomography with TLD: A correlation between CDTI vol values
Radiation Measurements, ISSN: 1350-4487, Vol: 177, Page: 107275
2024
- 1Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Article Description
This study investigates pediatric Computed Tomography (CT) dosimetry, specifically in the thoracic and head regions, using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The investigation, conducted at the Imaging Diagnostic Center of the Dom Vicente Scherer Hospital, involved two CT machines, the GE Optima 540 and Revolution EVO models. It aims to correlate in vivo TLD analysis with experimental CT Dose Index Volume (CTDIvol) values. The research reveals a maximum variation between machine-indicated CTDI values of 5.7% for the Optima 540 model and 6.8% for the Revolution EVO model at a voltage of 120 kV. Comparison with dose reference levels (DRL) from the United Kingdom and the United States indicates that the obtained values are below these standards, suggesting safe practices in the participating hospital. However, a larger sample size is recommended to establish local standards securely. In the thoracic region, nominal CTDI vol values indicate measurements around 150% lower than the dose values measured by TLD's, however, no correlation was found between the two variables (p-value = 0.09). In the head, nominal CTDI vol values varied on average 21% above the doses measured by TDL's, showing a strong correlation between the two quantities (p-value = 0.0002). The study highlights the importance of cautious interpretation of the CTDI vol and the need for continuous optimization of procedures to ensure safe practices and minimize the risks of radiation exposure in pediatric patients.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know