The influence of geometrical changes on the dose distribution after I-125 seed implantation of the prostate
Radiotherapy and Oncology, ISSN: 0167-8140, Vol: 83, Issue: 1, Page: 11-17
2007
- 13Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef10
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
After prostate implantation, dose calculation is usually based on a single imaging session, assuming no geometrical changes occur during the months of dose accumulation. In this study, the effect of changes in anatomy and implant geometry on the dose distribution was investigated. One day, 1 month and 312 months after seed implantation, a combined TRUS-CT scan was made of 13 patients. Based on these scans changes in dose rate distribution were determined in prostate, urethra and bladder and a ‘geometry corrected’ dose distribution was estimated. When based on the day-1 scan, parameters representing high dose volumes in prostate and urethra were largely underestimated: V150 of the prostate 18 ± 10% and V120 of the urethra 47 ± 32%. The dose to a 2 cm 3 hotspot in the bladder wall (D2cc), however, was overestimated by 31 ± 35%. Parameters based on scans 1 month post-implant or later were all within ±5% of geometry corrected values. Values meant to indicate the adequacy of dose coverage of the prostate, V100 and D90, were not influenced by geometrical changes and were independent of the post-implant scan date. Other parameters representing high dose volumes changed strongly within the first month after implantation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814007000606; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34047269421&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17349706; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167814007000606; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know