Anal cancer brachytherapy: From radon seeds to interstitial Papillon technique in a century. What does the future hold?
Radiotherapy and Oncology, ISSN: 0167-8140, Vol: 169, Page: 25-34
2022
- 8Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef4
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Review Description
Evidence from studies which combined 2D-3D external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± chemotherapy with 2D brachytherapy (BT) for anal cancer suggest favorable outcomes when compared with chemo-EBRT alone. Further improvement of results can be expected in the era of intensity modulated EBRT and MRI-guided adaptive BT. Despite this, BT is not discussed as a therapeutic option in the prominent international guidelines and its use remains limited to selected institutions. Special skills, complexity, equipment, cost and reimbursement policies have been highlighted as barriers for its wider implementation. However, these factors are relevant for modern radiotherapy in general. Therefore, it can be argued that the role of BT as a component of chemoradiation should be redefined. We describe the historical evolution and current role of BT boost for anal cancer and outline its potential in the context of combined intensity modulated EBRT, chemotherapy and MRI-guided adaptive BT.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814022000871; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125122434&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35151714; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167814022000871; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know