PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Radiotherapy for Ledderhose disease: Results of the LedRad-study, a prospective multicentre randomised double-blind phase 3 trial

Radiotherapy and Oncology, ISSN: 0167-8140, Vol: 185, Page: 109718
2023
  • 6
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 25
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 11
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Radiotherapy is considered a treatment option for Ledderhose disease. However, its benefits have never been confirmed in a randomised controlled trial. Therefore, the LedRad-study was conducted. The LedRad-study is a prospective multicentre randomised double-blind phase three trial. Patients were randomised to sham-radiotherapy (placebo) or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pain reduction at 12 months after treatment, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary endpoints were pain reduction at 6 and 18 months after treatment, quality of life (QoL), walking abilities and toxicity. A total of 84 patients were enrolled. At 12 and 18 months, patients in the radiotherapy group had a lower mean pain score compared to patients in the sham-radiotherapy group (2.5 versus 3.6 (p = 0.03) and 2.1 versus 3.4 (p = 0.008), respectively). Pain relief at 12 months was 74% in the radiotherapy group and 56% in the sham-radiotherapy group (p = 0.002). Multilevel testing for QoL scores showed higher QoL scores in the radiotherapy group compared to the sham-radiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients in the radiotherapy group had a higher mean walking speed and step rate with barefoot speed walking (p = 0.02). Erythema, skin dryness, burning sensations and increased pain were the most frequently reported side effects. These side effects were generally graded as mild (95%) and the majority (87%) were resolved at 18 months follow-up. Radiotherapy for symptomatic Ledderhose disease is an effective treatment resulting in a significant pain reduction, improvement of QoL scores and bare feet walking abilities, in comparison to sham-radiotherapy.

Bibliographic Details

de Haan, Anneke; van Nes, Johanna G H; Kolff, M Willemijn; van der Toorn, Peter-Paul; Westenberg, A Helen; van der Vegt, Annelies E; Groen, Henk; Overbosch, Jelle; van der Laan, Hans Paul; Werker, Paul M N; Langendijk, Johannes A; Steenbakkers, Roel J H M

Elsevier BV

Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know