Radiation dose simulation for high-current repetitively pulsed electron accelerator
Radiation Physics and Chemistry, ISSN: 0969-806X, Vol: 195, Page: 110059
2022
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
Review Description
In this study, the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit was used to simulate radiation doses for a high-current repetitively pulsed electron accelerator. We have created a model that allows us to predict the distribution of radiation doses around an operating accelerator. The materials and geometry of the accelerator were in accordance with the design documentation. The values of radiation doses were obtained for different initial parameters of the electron beam. The values obtained are compared with the measurement results. Application of the developed model will make it possible to predict the distribution of the radiation dose around the accelerator. Note that the developed model is sensitive to the initial parameters of the electrons. This opens up a wide field of activity for studying the radiation effects around an operating accelerator, depending on the magnetic field of the solenoid, the cathode type, collector materials and slow wave structure. In the future it is planned to conduct a detailed study of the dependence of radiation doses on the geometry and composition of the collector, where most of the accelerated electrons are utilised. These studies will help to significantly reduce the radiation doses around the working accelerator.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X22001013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110059; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126101887&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969806X22001013; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110059
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know