A real-world assessment of the robustness of gel dosimetry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry, ISSN: 0969-806X, Vol: 210, Page: 111009
2023
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to evaluate the robustness of a transported gel dosimeter. Six vials were filled with a normoxic N -vinylpyrrolidone-based polymer gel dosimeter containing inorganic salt as a sensitizer (iVIPET), manufactured by Triangle Products (Kashiwa, Japan). Three vials were sent to the home institution (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan) and three to an external institution. At each institution, vials received a dose of 0, 5, or 10 Gy using a 10 MV X-ray beam. After irradiation, the gel in the vial was imaged using a 3 T MRI scanner, and an R 2 (spin–spin relaxation rate) map was created. The dose– R 2 relationship was then analyzed using linear regression and the dose uncertainty computed. Thirty-four institutions participated in the study from July 2020 to July 2021. At the home institution, dose uncertainties were constant throughout the year (95% confidence interval [mean ± 1.96σ]: 3.3 ± 2.1% at 5 Gy and 4.0 ± 2.5% at 10 Gy). The ratio of the dose uncertainties measured at the external institutions and home institution was 1.1 ± 0.4 at 5 Gy ( r = 0.88) and 1.0 ± 0.3 at 10 Gy ( r = 0.81). Dose uncertainties were approximately 4% within 4 d of transportation but exceeded 10% when the gels were irradiated 7 d after fabrication. Temperature variations during transportation resulted in negligible uncertainties in absorbed dose; however, extended transportation times may increase dose uncertainty. Thus, polymer gel dosimeters should be used within 2–4 d of fabrication.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X23002542; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159607021&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969806X23002542; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know