ESTRADIOL PRIMING IN IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, ISSN: 1472-6483, Vol: 49, Page: 104567
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Abstract Description
To determine the effect of follicular phase estrogen priming in IVF cycles. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university based IVF clinic between 2017-2021. Five hundred and fifty-one cycles were analyzed where study (116) and control (435) groups treated with GnRH antagonist fixed protocol while study group received additional 6mg/day of estrogen starting from the 1 st day of cycle until the hCG trigger and clomiphene citrate for 5-15 days. Only one cycle of each patient were included to the study so number of patients and cycles were equal. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and gonadotropin consumption. Secondary outcomes were abortion rate, chemical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate and intrapartum exitus rate. Mean BMI was significantly higher in study group whilst all the remaining demographic properties were similar. Basal serum FSH levels (8.54 - 10.01, p=0.03), AFC (8.54 - 10.01, p=0.03), total gonadotropin consumption (1611.76 -2975.81, p=0.00) and ovarian stimulation duration (7.40 - 9.4, p=0.00) were significantly lower in study group while maximum serum LH level (10.12 -3.42, p = 0.00) and Pg level (1.52 - 1.00, p = 0.015) were statistically higher. Number of collected oocytes, M 1 and M 2 oocytes were similar for both groups where M 2 oocyte rate (71.3% - 75.0%, p = 0.04) was significantly higher in the control group. Post IVF results (number of ICSI, PN, cleavage, blast, transferred embryo, frozen embryo, fertilization rate, FORT and FOI) were similar for both groups. Single/twin pregnancy, single/twin birth, chemical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion and intrapartum exitus rates were similar. Clinical pregnancy (29.4 -23.4, p< 0.01), single pregnancy (21.8-16.4, p< 0.01), total live birth (20.2 -14.8, p< 0.01) and single live birth (17.6 - 12.5, p< 0.01) rates represented an increasing trend in the study group with a p value < 0.01. This research supports the possibility of follicular phase estrogen priming in IVF cycles to increase the clinical pregnancy rates compared to conventional OS protocols while decreasing the gonadotropin consumption as it decreases financial burden of IVF cycles on patients and healthcare system.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know