Valoración nutricional por ecografía del recto femoral y el tejido adiposo preperitoneal como predictores del riesgo de complicaciones del paciente hospitalizado
Revista Clínica Española, ISSN: 0014-2565, Vol: 223, Issue: 10, Page: 640-646
2023
- 4Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Case Description
La desnutrición y la sarcopenia se asocian al aumento del riesgo de eventos adversos y peor evolución en los pacientes hospitalizados. La ecografía constituye una herramienta de utilidad en la evaluación de la composición corporal. Se reclutaron 23 pacientes ingresados en una planta de hospitalización. Se recogieron las variables ecográficas del tejido muscular y tejido adiposo, así como su variación durante el ingreso. Correlacionándose con datos antropométricos, clínicos y analíticos. Observamos una correlación de las mediciones ecográficas con la duración de la hospitalización (grasa preperitoneal máxima: −0,585, grosor del recto femoral [RF]: −0,539, área del RF: −0,540), la fragilidad (RF: −0,599) y la dependencia (RF: 0,628). La capacidad de contracción del RF se correlacionó con el ejercicio semanal reportado (0,642). El grosor del RF y de la grasa preperitoneal se correlacionan con el número de días de ingreso y la capacidad funcional, erigiéndose como variables pronósticas. Malnutrition and sarcopenia are associated with increased risk of adverse events and worse outcome in hospitalised patients. Ultrasonography is a useful tool in the assessment of body composition. Twenty-three patients admitted to a hospital ward were recruited. Ultrasonographic variables of muscle tissue and adipose tissue were collected, as well as their variation during admission. These were correlated with anthropometric, clinical and analytical data. We observed a correlation of ultrasound measurements with length of hospitalisation (maximum preperitoneal fat −0.585, rectus femoris thickness [RF] −0.539, RF area −0.540), frailty (RF −0.599) and dependency (RF 0.628). RF contractile capacity correlated with reported weekly exercise (0.642). RF and preperitoneal fat thickness correlate with the number of days of admission and functional capacity, emerging as prognostic variables.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001649; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2023.09.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176269548&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0014256523001649; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2023.09.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know